| Before getting started, familiarise yourself with the review process, Hubble and its instruments, the types of proposals you will be reviewing, and who to ask for help! | During this phase, you will: - Check for and report additional conflicts of interest with your assigned proposals.
- Read your assigned proposals (a subset of the proposals assigned to your panel).
- Enter numerical scores as grades for each proposal you are assigned.
- Write brief proposal feedback comments (strengths and weaknesses) for each proposal you are assigned. Reviewers are forbidden from uploading proposal content or review materials to Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) tools since this violates the confidentiality of the review process.
- STScI will use the grades received by each reviewer assigned to each proposal to rank the proposals in the panel. The top proposals likely to be recommended for acceptance are provided to the panel Chairs of the face-to-face Discussion panels of that same Scientific Category prior to the meeting to identify potential duplications and monitor programmatic balance.
- Report to the Science Policy Division, and as soon as possible, any proposal that you think should be disqualified for violating proposal guidelines (e.g. DAPR, page limits, font size, etc.).
Please remember to remove review materials from your computer after the review. |
Important Dates and Deadlines: - Thursday April 16: HST proposal deadline
| Important Dates and Deadlines: - Friday May 1: SPD to release proposals and assignments
- Tuesday May 5, 12:05pm-1:25pm EDT: External Panelists Orientation
- Friday May 8: Deadline for additional conflicts of interest
- Friday May 29: Deadline for grades and comments
|