Discussion Panelists
Proposals reviewed by the Discussion panels are subject to a two-stage review process: 1) asynchronous preliminary grading; and 2) the virtual review meeting.
Discussion panelists will read and grade all proposals that they are assigned, and write feedback comments for a subset of those. They also advise their Panel Chair and Vice Chair on a subset of the Large, Treasury, and Legacy proposals assigned for review to the Executive Committee.
Prep Work & General Info | Preliminary Grading | Pre-Meeting | Discussion Meeting | Post-Meeting |
---|---|---|---|---|
Before April 10, 2024. | April 10 - May 14, 2024 | May 15-27, 2024 | May 28-31, 2024 | June 1-3, 2023 |
Before getting started, familiarise yourself with the review process, Hubble and its instruments, the types of proposals you will be reviewing, and who to ask for help! | During this phase, you will:
Each proposal will receive 6 grades. STScI will use the grades to rank and triage the panel so that only the top proposals are discussed in the panel meeting. | During this phase, you will:
We strongly encourage you to use the SPIRIT tool to enter notes summarizing the strengths and weaknesses for your primary/secondary assignments. | The panel meets for 3 days. During this phase, you will:
| During this phase, you will:
Please remember to remove review materials from your computer after the review. |
Learn more about: | Learn more about:
Useful topics from previous phases: | Learn more about: Useful topics from previous phases: | Learn more about: Useful topics from previous phases:
| Learn more about: Useful topics from previous phases:
|
Important Dates and Deadlines:
| Important Dates and Deadlines:
| Important Dates and Deadlines:
| Important Dates and Deadlines:
| Important Dates and Deadlines:
|