5.7 UVIS Photometry Errors
The photometric internal precision for the new (2020) time-dependent WFC3 UVIS inverse sensitivities, computed from observations of the four white dwarf standards GD153, GD71, G191B2B, GRW+70 5824, and the G-type star P330E are: ~ 0.5% for the wide-, medium-, and narrow-band filters and ~10 to 15% for the quad filters. However, the absolute error due to systematics and uncertainties in the white dwarf models used as absolute standards can be up to 1.5%. The signal to noise ratio, per observation, for the standard stars is such that the Poisson error is ~0.2% or less for most filters.
For those users who need precise photometry, a complete error analysis would include Poisson noise of the science target as well the additional sources of error of flat fielding (see Section 5.4), spatial repeatability (~0.5%, but see Section 5.4.2), readout noise (Section 5.1.2), uncertainty in the encircled energy (Section 9.1), and charge transfer efficiency corrections (CTE, see Chapter 6).
-
WFC3 Data Handbook
- • Acknowledgments
- • What's New in This Revision
- Preface
- Chapter 1: WFC3 Instruments
- Chapter 2: WFC3 Data Structure
- Chapter 3: WFC3 Data Calibration
- Chapter 4: WFC3 Images: Distortion Correction and AstroDrizzle
- Chapter 5: WFC3 UVIS Sources of Error
- Chapter 6: WFC3 UVIS Charge Transfer Efficiency - CTE
-
Chapter 7: WFC3 IR Sources of Error
- • 7.1 WFC3 IR Error Source Overview
- • 7.2 Gain
- • 7.3 WFC3 IR Bias Correction
- • 7.4 WFC3 Dark Current and Banding
- • 7.5 Blobs
- • 7.6 Detector Nonlinearity Issues
- • 7.7 Count Rate Non-Linearity
- • 7.8 IR Flat Fields
- • 7.9 Pixel Defects and Bad Imaging Regions
- • 7.10 Time-Variable Background
- • 7.11 IR Photometry Errors
- • 7.12 References
- Chapter 8: Persistence in WFC3 IR
- Chapter 9: WFC3 Data Analysis
- Chapter 10: WFC3 Spatial Scan Data