4.3 CCD Operations and Limitations

Information regarding the HRC is provided for archival purposes only. Please check for updates regarding WFC on the ACS website.

4.3.1 CCD Saturation: The CCD Full Well

The average full well depths for the ACS CCDs are given in Table 3.1 as 84,700 e– for the WFC and 155,000  e for the HRC, but the pixel-to-pixel values vary by ~10% and ~18% across the fields of view of the WFC and the HRC, respectively. When the CCD is over-exposed, pixels will saturate and excess charge will flow into adjacent pixels along the column. This condition is known as “blooming” or “bleeding.” Extreme overexposure does not cause any long-term damage to the CCDs, so there are no bright object limits for the ACS CCDs. When using GAIN = 2 for the WFC and GAIN = 4 for the HRC, the linearity of the detectors deviates by less than 1% up to the full well depths. On-orbit tests using aperture photometry show that this linearity is maintained when summing over pixels that surround an area affected by charge bleeding, even when the central pixel is saturated by 10 times its full well depth (see ACS ISR 2004-01 and ACS ISR 2019-03 for details). However, note that A-to-D saturated pixels, those in excess of 65,535 DN, are not viable for science though linearity is maintained beyond full well saturation.

4.3.2 CCD Shutter Effects on Exposure Times

The ACS camera has a very fast shutter; even the shortest exposure times are not significantly affected by the finite travel time of the shutter blades. On-orbit testing reported in ACS ISR 2003-03 verified that shutter shading corrections are not necessary to support 1% relative photometry for either the HRC or WFC. We note that the commanding overheads of WFC introduce an additional ~3.0 seconds of dark current integration time beyond the commanded exposure time. This additional dark-time is included in the dark-current subtraction stage of the CALACS pipeline (see the ACS Data Handbook for further details).

Four exposure times are known to have errors of up to 4.1%; e.g., the nominal 0.1 seconds HRC exposure was really 0.1041 seconds. These errant exposure times are accommodated by updates to the reference files used in image pipeline processing. No significant differences exist between exposure times controlled by the two shutters (A and B), with the possible exception of non-repeatability up to ~1% for WFC exposures in the 0.7 to 2.0 second range. The HRC provided excellent shutter time repeatability.

4.3.3 Read Noise

Please check for updates on the ACS website.

WFC

The read noise levels in the physical prescan and imaging regions of the four WFC amplifiers were measured for all gain settings during the orbital verification period following the installation of the CEB-R in SM4. The average WFC read noise is about 25% lower than before SM4 (ACS ISR 2011-04). This reduction is due to the use in the CEB-R of a dual-slope integrator (DSI) in the pixel signal processing chain instead of the clamp-and-sample method of pixel sampling used in the original CEB. The DSI method offers lower signal processing noise at the expense of a spatially variable bias level.

In Figure 4.6, the read noise of the four WFC amplifiers are plotted versus date. The read noise values are steady to 1% or better, except for four discrete events during the ACS lifetime. Two of these events were associated with ACS electronics changes: 1) a jump in the amplifier C noise after the 2006 failure of the Side 1 electronics, and 2) the overall drop in noise once the ACS was repaired during SM4 in 2009. The two other events, 20–30% noise increases in amplifier A (June 2003) and amplifier D (January/February 2013), have been ascribed to radiation damage on the detector (ACS TIR 2013-021). Fluctuating read noise levels stabilized after subsequent anneals (see Section 4.3.5).

Although amplifier D now has significantly elevated read noise compared with the other amplifiers, most WFC broad-band observations remain sky-limited rather than read-noise limited. Note also that the WFC pre-defined subarray apertures may now be specified for any amplifier, but we recommend the use of the lowest-noise amplifier B.

Prior to Cycle 24, data taken with the old subarray format experienced slightly increased read noise due to variations in the clocking rate of pixel readout of subarrays relative to full-frame images. The read noise increased with decreasing subarray size, and in the worst case was about 0.15 electrons higher in a 512 × 512 pixel subarray image than in a full-frame image. More information can be found in ACS ISR 2019-02. For subarrays taken in Cycle 24 and after, the method used to read out the detectors was updated, which removed this increased read noise (ACS ISR 2017-03).

Figure 4.6: History of ACS/WFC read noise

Read noise history of the four readout amplifiers of ACS/WFC. Amplifiers A and B read out WFC1, and amplifiers C and D read out WFC2 (see Figure 4.2 for schematic). These values are measured at the serial register using calibration bias frames taken regularly throughout the ACS lifetime. See text for discussion.

HRC

Prior to January 2007, the read noise of the HRC was monitored using only the default amplifier C and the default gain of 2 e/DN. No variations were observed with time. The read noise measured in the physical prescan and image areas were consistent with the pre-flight values of 4.74 e (see Table 4.2 and Table 4.3).

4.3.4 Dark Current

Please check for updates on the ACS website.

All ACS CCDs are buried channel devices which have a shallow n-type layer implanted below the surface to store and transfer the collected charge away from the traps associated with the Si-SiO2 interface. Moreover, ACS CCDs are operated in Multi-Pinned Phase (MPP) mode so that the silicon surface is inverted and the surface dark current is suppressed. ACS CCDs therefore have very low dark current. The WFC CCDs are operated in MPP mode only during integration, so the total dark current figure for WFC includes a small component of surface dark current accumulated during the readout time.

Like all CCDs operated in a Low Earth Orbit (LEO) radiation environment, the ACS CCDs are subject to radiation damage by energetic particles trapped in the radiation belts. Ionization damage and displacement damage are two types of damage caused by protons in silicon. The MPP mode is very effective in mitigating the damage due to ionization such as the generation of surface dark current due to the creation of trapping states in the Si-SiO2 interface. Although only a minor fraction of the total energy is lost by a proton via non-ionizing energy loss, the displacement damage can cause significant performance degradation in CCDs by decreasing the charge transfer efficiency (CTE), increasing the average dark current, and introducing pixels with very high dark current (hot pixels). Displacement damage to the silicon lattice occurs mostly due to the interaction between low energy protons and silicon atoms. The generation of phosphorous-vacancy centers introduces an extra level of energy between the conduction band and the valence band of the silicon. New energetic levels in the silicon bandgap have the direct effect of increasing the dark current as a result of carrier generation in the bulk depletion region of the pixel. As a consequence, the dark current of CCDs operated in a radiative environment is predicted to increase with time.

Ground testing of the WFC CCDs, radiated with a cumulative fluence equivalent to 2.5 and 5 years of on-orbit exposure, predicted a linear growth of ~1.5 e/pixel/hour/year. The dark current in ACS CCDs is monitored three days per week with the acquisition of four 1000-second dark frames (totaling 12 images per week and including post-flash as of January 2015). Dark frames are used to create reference files for the calibration of scientific images, and to track and catalog hot pixels as they evolve. The dark reference files are generated by combining one month of darks in order to remove cosmic rays and reduce the statistical noise. As expected, the dark current increases with time. From 2011 to 2019, the observed linear growth rates of dark current are 2.6 and 2.5 e/pixel/hour/year for WFC1 and WFC2 respectively. Prior to 2007, the observed linear growth rate of dark current was 2.1 e/pixel/hour/year for the HRC CCD.

At the beginning of the Side 2 operation in July 2006, the temperature set point of the WFC was lowered from –77 °C to –81 °C (documented in ACS TIR 2006-021). Dark current and hot pixels depend strongly on the operating temperature. The reduction of the operating temperature of the WFC CCDs reduced the number of hot pixels by almost 50% (see Figure 4.8) and reduced the dark current in both WFC1 and WFC2. The dark rate shows a clear drop on July 4, 2006, when the temperature was changed. The new operating temperature brought the dark current of the WFC CCDs back to the level it was eighteen months after the launch.

All dark frames have been post-flashed since January 2015 (ACS ISR 2015-03). This has resulted in a slight increase in the noise of the final superdark images, but a more accurate representation of the dark current and hot/warm pixels. The higher background level provided by the flash alleviates the effects of CTE. As of August 2019, the dark current has been measured to be 40 to 50 e/pixel/hour among the four amplifiers.

Figure 4.7: Hot Pixel Growth Rate for HRC

Hot pixel (DQ flag 16) growth rates in the HRC during its operational lifetime. The sawtooth pattern corresponds to ACS anneal cycles. The growth rate increased slightly when the anneal duration was switched from 12 to 6 hours. The slight drop in hot pixels coincided with the switch to Side 2 electronics.
Figure 4.8: Pixel Stability and Hot Pixel Growth in WFC.

The populations of warm, hot, and unstable pixels in the WFC CCDs over their operational lifetime as measured from the monthly CTE-corrected superdarks. The sudden decrease in stable hot pixels in mid-2006 is attributed to the temperature change from -77 ºC to -81 ºC, which coincides with the switch to the Side 2 electronics. The small increase in stable hot pixels in early-2015 is the result of better CTE loss correction due to post-flashing dark images. The population of unstable pixels remains relatively steady over the history of ACS.
Figure 4.9: ACS/WFC Dark Current Histograms



Distribution of dark current in WFC detector pixels over time as measured from normal (top) and CTE-corrected (bottom) superdark images. Over time, the distribution shifts to the right as the global dark current increases. The tail towards higher dark current values also increases in amplitude as the number of hot and warm pixels increases with time. The introduction of post-flash in the dark images in 2015 changed the shape of the distribution slightly, and allowed for a more accurate correction of CTE losses. While the shapes of the normal (top) and CTE-corrected (bottom) distributions are slightly different, the global dark current rates are similar.

4.3.5 Warm and hot pixels

Please check for updates on the ACS website.

In the presence of a high electric field, the dark current of a single pixel can be greatly enhanced. Such pixels are called hot pixels. Although the increase in the mean dark current with proton irradiation is important, of greater consequence is the large increase in dark current nonuniformity.

We have chosen to classify the field-enhanced pixels into two categories: warm and hot pixels. The definition of "warm" and "hot" pixel is somewhat arbitrary, and there have been several changes to the definition of warm and hot pixel throughout the lifetime of ACS. The values associated with these flags over time are summarized in Table 4.5. In January 2015 we adjusted the ranges of hot and warm pixels as follows; a pixel above 0.14 e/pixel/second is considered a "hot" pixel. A pixel below the hot pixel range but above 0.06 e/pixel/second is considered a "warm" pixel. The new values were chosen by comparing the hot and warm pixel percentages found in the years following SM4 (ACS ISR 2015-03). For consistency, all archived WFC observations were updated in early 2018 to use the current warm and hot pixel definitions.

Warm and hot pixels accumulate as a function of time on orbit. Defects responsible for elevated dark rate are created continuously as a result of the ongoing displacement damage on orbit. The one-time reduction of the WFC operating temperature in 2006 dramatically reduced the overall dark current and hot pixel fraction but, by 2011, these values had degraded past their previous levels.


Table 4.4: Creation rate of new warm, hot, and unstable pixels (% of detector per year).

Pixel Type

WFC (–81 °C)

Warm Stable (0.06 - 0.14 e/pix/sec)

0.14

Hot Stable (>0.14 e/pix/sec)

0.09

Total Unstable

~0


Many hot pixels are transient. Like other CCDs on HST, the ACS WFC undergoes a monthly annealing process. The WFC CCDs and the thermal electric coolers are powered off, and heaters are powered on to warm the CCDs to ~19 °C. Although the annealing mechanism at such low temperatures is not yet understood, after this "thermal cycle" the population of hot pixels is slightly reduced (see Figure 4.7). The anneal rate depends on the dark current rate; very hot pixels are annealed more easily than warm pixels. For pixels classified as "hot" (those with dark rate > 0.14 e/pix/sec for WFC, and > 0.08 e/pix/sec for HRC) the anneal heals ~3% for WFC and ~14% for HRC.

Table 4.5: Hot and Warm Pixel Flags Over the History of ACS

Dates

Warm pixel flag (e/s)

Hot pixel flag (e/s)

Launch - Oct 8 2004

Not used

Static hot pixel list

Oct 8 2004 - Jan 2007 (Pre SM4)

0.02 - 0.08

≥0.08

May 2009 (Pre SM4) - Jan 15 2015

0.04 - 0.08

≥0.08

Jan 15 2015 - present

0.06 - 0.14[a]

≥0.14[a]

aAs of 2018, all WFC data in the archive use these warm and hot pixel definitions.

Annealing has no effect on the normal pixels that are responsible for the increase in the mean dark current rate. Such behavior was also seen with STIS and WFC3 CCDs during ground radiation testing. Since the anneal cycles do not repair 100% of the hot pixels, there is a growing population of permanent hot pixels (see Figures 4.84.9, and 4.10).

Figure 4.10: A subsection of WFC1 dark frames taken at different epochs showing the increasing population of hot pixels. From left to right: before launch, and 1, 2, 3, and 4 years on orbit.

Stable warm and hot pixels are eliminated by the superdark subtraction. However, some pixels show a dark current that is not stable with time but switches between well defined levels. These fluctuations may have timescales of a few minutes and have the characteristics of random telegraph signal (RTS) noise. The dark current in field-enhanced hot pixels can be dependent on the signal level, so the noise is much higher than the normal shot noise. As a consequence, since the locations of warm and hot pixels are known from dark frames, they are flagged in the data quality array. Unstable pixels of any dark current level are also flagged in the data quality array. By default, only unstable pixels are discarded during image combination if multiple exposures are combined as part of a dither pattern (stable hot pixels are retained). In Figure 4.8, we show the prevalence of unstable pixels of various dark current levels over the lifetime of ACS/WFC (see ACS ISR 2017-05 for more information about pixel stability).

The standard CR-SPLIT approach allows rejection of cosmic rays, but hot pixels cannot be eliminated in post-observation processing without dithering between exposures.

Observers who previously used CR-SPLIT for their exposures are advised to use a dither pattern instead. Dithering by at least a few pixels allows the removal of cosmic rays, hot pixels, and other detector artifacts in post-observation processing.

For example, a simple ACS-WFC-DITHER-LINE pattern has been developed that shifts the image by 2 pixels in X and 2 pixels in Y along the direction that minimizes the effects of scale variation across the detector. The specific parameter values for this pattern are given on the ACS Dither webpage.

Additional information can be found in the Phase II Proposal Instructions.

4.3.6 Sink Pixels

Sink pixels are certain pixels in a CCD detector that are anomalously low compared to the background, due to the presence of extra charge traps. These charge traps can trap electrons in the sink pixel itself and also trap electrons from pixels that are transferred through the sink pixel during the readout process, giving rise to a low-valued trail following the sink pixel. The length of the trail depends on the background level of the image, in that images with higher backgrounds exhibit shorter sink pixel trails. In addition, about 30% of the time, a charge excess is found in the pixel immediately downstream of the sink pixel, closer to the amplifier. About 0.3 to 0.5% of pixels in the WFC detector are considered sink pixels in a given anneal cycle. Depending on the background level of an image, in total, about 1–2% of pixels in an image are sink pixels or affected by sink pixels. These pixels are flagged with DQ flag 1024 in all WFC images observed after January 15, 2015. More details can be found in ACS ISR 2017-01.

4.3.7 Cosmic Rays

Studies have been made of the characteristics of cosmic ray impacts on the HRC and WFC. The fraction of pixels affected by cosmic rays varies from 1.5% to 3% during a 1000 second exposure for both cameras, similar to what was seen on WFPC2 and STIS. This number provides the basis for assessing the risk that the target(s) in any set of exposures will be compromised. The affected fraction is the same for the WFC and HRC despite their factor of two difference in pixel areas. This is because the census of affected pixels is dominated by charge diffusion, not direct impacts. Observers seeking rare or serendipitous objects, as well as transients, may require that every single WFC pixel is free from cosmic ray impacts in at least one exposure among a set of exposures. For the cosmic ray fractions of 1.5% to 3% in 1000 seconds, a single ~2400 second orbit must be broken into four exposures (500 to 600 seconds each) to reduce the number of pixels affected by CRs in every exposure to 1 or less. Users requiring lower read noise may prefer three exposures of ~800 seconds, in which case CR-rejection should still be very good for most purposes. Two long exposures (i.e., 1200 seconds) are not recommended because residual CR contamination would be unacceptably high in most cases. We recommend that users dither these exposures to remove hot pixels as well as cosmic rays (see Section 7.4).

The flux deposited on the CCD from an individual cosmic ray does not depend on the energy of the cosmic ray, but rather the distance it travels in the silicon substrate. An analysis of 12,547 WFC darks and 5,611 HRC darks demonstrates that the interaction of high energy cosmic rays with the silicon substrate has a very well-defined distribution. The peak of the distribution occurs at ~1000 electrons and the distribution has a clear cut-off below ~500 electrons (see Figures 4.11 and 4.12).

Figure 4.11: Electron deposition by cosmic rays on WFC, normalized by the number of counts in the peak bin.

Figure 4.12: Electron deposition by cosmic rays on HRC, normalized by the number of counts in the peak bin.

The distribution of the number of pixels affected by a single cosmic ray is strongly peaked at 4 to 5 pixels. Although a few events encompass only one pixel, examination of these events indicates that some or maybe all of these sources are unstable pixels which can appear hot in one exposure (with no charge diffusion) and normal in the next. Such pixels are very rare but do exist. There is a long tail in the direction towards increasing numbers of attached pixels.

Distributions of sizes and anisotropies can be useful for distinguishing cosmic rays from astrophysical sources in a single image. The size distribution for both chips peaks near 0.4 pixels as a standard deviation (or 0.9 pixels as a FWHM). This is much narrower than the PSF and is thus a useful discriminant between unresolved sources and cosmic rays.

4.3.8 Charge Transfer Efficiency

Please check for updates on the ACS website.

Charge transfer efficiency (CTE) is a measure of how effectively the CCD moves charge between adjacent pixels during readout. A perfect CCD would be able to transfer 100% of the charge as it is shunted across the CCD and out through the serial register. In practice, small traps in the silicon lattice compromise this process by holding on to electrons, releasing them at a later time. Depending on the trap type, the release time ranges from a few microseconds to several seconds. For large charge packets (several thousands of electrons), losing a few electrons during readout is not a serious problem, but for smaller (~100e or less) signals, it can have a substantial effect.

The CTE numbers for the ACS CCDs at the time of installation are given in Table 4.6. While the numbers look impressive, reading out the WFC CCD requires 2048 parallel and 2048 serial transfers, which leads to almost 2% of the charge from a pixel in the corner opposite to the readout amplifier being lost during readout.


Table 4.6: 
Charge transfer efficiency measurements of the ACS CCDs prior to installation from Fe55 experiments (Sirianni et al. 2000, Proc. SPIE 4008)

CCD

Parallel

Serial

WFC1

0.999994

0.999999

WFC2

0.999995

0.999998

HRC

0.999997

0.999998


Like other CCD cameras aboard HST, ACS has suffered degraded CTE due to radiation damage since its installation in 2002. Since 2003, specific calibration programs aimed at characterizing the effects of the CTE on stellar photometry have been performed. Results from the internal CTE monitor program shows that CTE appears to decline linearly with time, and that CTE losses are stronger for lower signal levels (ACS ISR 2005-03, ACS ISR 2018-09). However, in order to derive an accurate correction formula for photometry, a number of observations at different epochs, sky backgrounds, and stellar fluxes have to be accumulated. The results of the observations taken through November 2011 are described in several ISRs (ACS ISR 2009-01ACS ISR 2011-01ACS ISR 2012-05) and are summarized here. For WFC, significant photometric losses are apparent for stars undergoing numerous parallel transfers (y-direction). As of 2015, the CTE loss was ~10% for a fiducial 100 e star at the center of the CCD with a typical background of 30e. This loss can rise to >50% in worst cases (faint sources, low backgrounds, farthest from the CCD serial register), rendering faint sources undetectable and thus unrecoverable with current pixel-based CTE correction algorithms. The size of the photometric loss appears to have a strong power-law dependence on the stellar flux, as seen in other CCDs flown on HST.

The dependence on background is significant, and it is possible to increase the background by using the post-flash capability. This is unlikely to be useful for most observations, but may make a significant difference in observations with extremely low background (ACS ISRs 2014-01 and 2018-02). The use of post-flash is discussed in more detail in Section 9.6.6.

It may also be useful, in some specific cases, to choose the filter in order to obtain a higher background (e.g., F606W). CTE degradation also has an impact on astrometry (see ACS ISR 2007-04). Therefore, for astrometric programs of relatively bright objects, the use of post-flash may be considered. No losses are apparent for WFC due to serial transfers (x-direction). Further details on CTE corrections of very bright stars on subarrays can be found in the ACS ISR 2011-01. A study of the CTE evolution is presented in ACS ISR 2012-03.

The predicted photometric losses (due to imperfect CTE) in observations carried out with the ACS/WFC may be calculated with the formulae in the ACS ISR 2012-05. Here we consider three "typical" science applications:

  1. A star of magnitude 22 in the VEGAMAG system observed with the F502N narrow band filter for an exposure time of 100 seconds has a sky background of 0.2 electrons. It is located 1000 parallel pixel transfers from the serial register, and therefore suffers a magnitude change of 0.51 mag.
  2. A Type Ia supernova at z ~ 1.5 close to its peak brightness (~26.5 mag in VEGAMAG), observed with filter F775W for 600 seconds, results in a sky background of ~50 electrons. It is located 1000 parallel pixel transfers from the serial register, and therefore has a magnitude change of 0.138 mag.
  3. A point source with a flux of 1 e/second observed for 600 seconds with a filter that gives a sky background level of 30 electrons has a magnitude change of 0.142 mag when subject to 1000 parallel pixel transfers.

An online CTE correction calculator is available for users at the ACS website.

Anderson & Bedin 2010, PASP, 122, 1035 have developed an empirical approach based on the CTE-trailed profiles of warm and hot pixels to characterize the effects of CTE losses for the ACS/WFC. Their algorithm first develops a model that reproduces the observed trails and then inverts the model to convert the observed pixel values in an image into an estimate of the original pixel values.

 An improved version of CALACS was released in 2012. Along with implementing the empirical CTE correction algorithm, that update also included corrections for the electronic artifacts introduced by the repair of the WFC during SM4, namely the bias shift effect (ACS ISR 2012-02), the bias striping effect (ACS ISR 2011-05), and the crosstalk effect (ACS ISR 2010-02). In addition to the standard data products (CRJ, FLT and DRZ files) there are three files (CRC, FLC and DRC) which contain the CTE-corrected data products. Users are now able to choose whether to use the standard or CTE-corrected products. CALACS applies the CTE correction to the raw images and requires CTE-corrected dark reference files. The ACS Team has produced the dark reference frames for the entire ACS archive (ACS TIR 2012-02 and 2018-011).

The empirical CTE correction algorithm was updated again and included in CALACS in August 2017. It works very well for intermediate to high flux levels (>200 electrons) and is more effective at low flux levels (<100 electrons). The algorithm also includes a step for mitigating readnoise amplification, and employs a more accurate time and temperature dependence for CTE over the ACS lifetime (ACS ISR 2018-04). A tool that uses the CTE model to simulate ACS/WFC readout, called the forward model, has been made available to users as part of CALACS. A python notebook that provides guidelines for running the forward model is available at the ACS Analysis Tools page.

The results of the empirical CTE correction algorithm on stellar fields are found to be in agreement with the photometric correction formula of ACS ISR 2012-05. Please refer to the ACS website for the latest information.

4.3.9 UV Light and the HRC CCD

In the optical, each photon generates a single electron. However, shortward of ~3200 Å, there is a finite probability of creating more than one electron per UV photon (see Christensen, O., J. App. Phys47, 689, 1976). At room temperature, the theoretical quantum yield (i.e., the number of electrons generated for a photon of energy E > 3.5eV (λ~3500 Å)), is Ne = E(eV)/3.65. The HRC CCDs quantum efficiency curve has not been corrected for this effect. The interested reader may wish to see the STIS Instrument Handbook for details on the signal-to-noise treatment for the STIS CCDs.

1TIRs available upon request.