# 10.4 Orbit Use Examples

One way to learn to estimate total orbit time requests is to work through a few examples. Below we provide five different cases:

1. A simple pair of UVIS images using one filter.
2. A set of short UVIS exposures that require large overheads associated with buffer dumps.
3. A one-orbit IR observation using two different filters.
4. A two-orbit UVIS observation using dithering.
5. A one orbit IR grism spectroscopic observation.

Note that some of the examples use un-dithered images; however observers are advised to use dithering whenever possible (see Appendix C). In addition, although observers can request the use of shadow or low-sky target visibility restrictions, the examples below are all for the standard (i.e., unrestricted) target visibility (see the HST Primer, Section 6.3, for further discussion).

## 10.4.1 Example 1: UVIS, 1 Orbit, 1 Filter

Consider a target to be imaged with UVIS in a given filter in one orbit. Let us suppose that, by using the Exposure Time Calculator (ETC) (see Chapter 9), we find that we need a total exposure time of 2400 s to reach the desired S/N. Given that we desire the observation to be divided into two exposures for cosmic-ray removal (with a small dither step between them), we map the overheads and the science exposure times onto the orbit as follows.

Table 10.4: Orbit Calculation for Example 1

 Action Time (minutes) Explanation Guide-star acquisition 6.5 Needed at start of observation of new target UVIS overhead for first exposure 2.6 Includes filter selection, camera set-up, and readout First science exposure 20.0 Small dither maneuver (< 1.25") 0.3 UVIS overhead for second exposure 2.1 Includes readout Second science exposure 20.0 Total exposure time is 40 min Total time used 51.5

Thus, with a total time of nearly 52 minutes, this set of observations would fit into all unrestricted HST orbits. The exposure time could, if needed, be adjusted so as to fill the actual target visibility interval (which depends on several factors, including the date and target location in the sky, as described in Chapter 6 of the HST Primer). The time needed to dump the buffer following the second sub-exposure incurs no overhead in this example, because it can be performed during target occultation.

Note that this simple sequence of two fairly long exposures would, with an appropriately-oriented dither step, just cover the 1.2" gap between the two CCD chips (see Section 6.3).

## 10.4.2 Example 2: UVIS, 1 Orbit, Short Exposures

This example illustrates the impact of short exposures on the useful time in the orbit. Suppose we intend to use one orbit to observe a target with UVIS in two filters, F606W and F814W. The observation consists of two sequences, each one with two identical CR-SPLIT exposures, for a total of four individual sub-exposures. Suppose that the ETC shows that the exposure time must be 540 seconds for each of the filters, so each of the CR-SPLIT sub-exposures must be at least 270 seconds long. For the target declination, which in this example is −35°, we find that the unrestricted visibility time is 55 minutes. The time budget for the orbit (under-filling it) is as follows.

Table 10.5: Orbit Calculation for Example 2

 Action Time (minutes) Explanation Guide-star acquisition 6.5 Needed at start of observation of new target UVIS overheads for first sub-exposures in both series 2 × 2.6 = 5.2 Includes filter change, camera set-up, and readouts UVIS overheads for subsequent sub-exposures in both series 2 × 2.1 = 4.2 Includes readouts Buffer dump after 2nd sub-exposure 2 × 5.8 = 11.6 Full buffer must be dumped in target visibility in order to obtain the last two exposures, which are too short to accommodate dump (270 sec < 348 sec). Science exposures 4 × 4.5 = 18.0 Total time used 45.5

Compared with Example 1, we see that the observing efficiency is very low due to the large overheads associated with buffer dumps. We have achieved only 18 minutes of exposure time during 45 minutes of total time used, whereas in Example 1 we obtained 40 minutes of exposure time during 51.5 minutes of total time used. Of course, this is caused by the short exposures versus the long exposures of Example 1, where “short” and “long” are relative to the time to dump the buffer, 348 seconds.

The time that is "lost" to dumping the buffer in this example can be recovered by sufficiently increasing the exposure time (as discussed in Section 10.3) to enable dumping while an exposure is being made. For example, if the 540-second exposure time per filter is required to obtain a minimum S/N (and not to avoid saturation), then increasing the exposure times to 720 s (2 x 360 s) per filter will improve the S/N and bring the total time used to 40 minutes.

Alternatively, if compatible with the scientific goals, a subarray could have been used to read out only a fraction of the detector area, allowing more frames to be stored in the buffer before requiring a dump. In this example, using UVIS 2k × 2k subarrays for 4 short (<348 seconds) exposures would save about 8 minutes of readout time and 12 minutes of dump time.

## 10.4.3 Example 3: IR, 1 Orbit, 2 Filters

The third example demonstrates the orbit calculation for a simple IR observation. We want to obtain full-frame images of a target in two filters, F110W and F160W. Suppose that the ETC has shown that the exposure times adequate for our scientific goals are 10 minutes in F110W and 20 minutes in F160W. These times can be achieved with the up-the-ramp MULTIACCUM sequences SPARS50, NSAMP=15 (11.7 min) and SPARS100, NSAMP=15 (23.4 min), respectively. From the orbit visibility table (see Chapter 6 of the HST Primer), suppose that we find that at the target declination (here assumed to be 0°) the unrestricted target visibility time is 54 minutes. The resulting orbit calculation is as follows.

Table 10.6: Orbit Calculation for Example 3

 Action Time (minutes) Explanation Guide-star acquisition 6.5 Needed at start of observation of new target IR overheads for 2 exposures 2 × 1.0 = 2.0 Includes filter changes, camera set-ups, and readouts Science exposure in F110W 11.7 Science exposure in F160W 23.4 Total time used 43.6

The total time used in the orbit shows that our target can indeed be imaged in the selected filters within one orbit. Furthermore, the first exposure can be dumped from the buffer during the second exposure. The ~9 minutes of unused time could be used for an additional exposure, during which the second exposure would be dumped.

## 10.4.4 Example 4: UVIS, Dithering, 2 Orbits, 1 Filter

This example illustrates the orbit calculation for a UVIS observation with a WFC3 UVIS box dithering pattern, which implements imaging at four pointings. The goal of the observation is to obtain a dithered image of a field in such a way that would allow us to bridge the ~1.2 arcsec inter-chip gap between the UVIS CCDs in the combined image. As indicated in Table 10.1, for a 2-arcsec offset maneuver, the three dithers will take 0.5 minutes each. Suppose we have determined that the exposure time necessary to reach the desired S/N ratio is 80 minutes, and that the visibility time at our target declination, assumed to be +53°, is 58 minutes. Furthermore, we will use the cosmic-ray removal provided by the dither data-reduction package. As a result, the orbit calculation will involve a sequence of four exposures of 20-minutes duration (i.e., one exposure at each of the four dither pointings). These observations will be distributed across two HST orbits, as shown in the following Table 10.7.

Table 10.7: Orbit Calculation for Example 4

 Action Time (minutes) Explanation Orbit 1 Guide-star acquisition 6.5 Needed at start of observation of new target UVIS overhead for first exposure 2.6 Includes filter change, camera set-up, and readout UVIS overhead for second exposure 2.1 Includes readout Spacecraft maneuver 0.5 To offset from first to second dither pointing Two science exposures 2 × 20 = 40.0 Exposures at the first two pointings in the dither pattern Total time used in orbit 1 51.7 Orbit 2 Guide-star re-acquisition 6.5 Needed at start of new orbit to observe same target UVIS overheads for 3rd and 4th exposures 2 × 2.1 = 4.2 Includes readouts Spacecraft maneuvers 2 × 0.5 = 1.0 To offset to the 3rd and 4th dither pointings Two science exposures 2 × 20 = 40.0 Exposures at the final two pointings in the dither pattern Total time used in orbit 2 51.7

No overhead is incurred to dump the exposures, because they are all longer than 348 seconds. Thus the desired exposures can be accomplished within the two orbits, and in fact there are ~7–8 minutes of unused visibility time per orbit that could be used to increase the exposure times.

## 10.4.5 Example 5: IR, 1 Orbit, Grism

This example illustrates the orbit calculation for an IR G102 grism spectroscopic observation. We will use the full-frame, up-the-ramp MULTIACCUM sequence SPARS200 with NSAMP=13, requiring 40 minutes to expose. We will also obtain undispersed (direct) images to calibrate target positions and wavelengths, using a SPARS10, NSAMP=15 (2.4-minute) exposure before and after the grism exposure. The overhead calculations are presented in Table 10.8.

Table 10.8: Orbit Calculation for Example 5

 Action Time (minutes) Explanation Guide-star acquisition 6.5 Needed at start of observation of new target IR overheads for 3 exposures 3 × 1.0 = 3.0 Includes filter changes, camera set-ups, and readouts Science exposure (undispersed) 2 × 2.4 = 4.8 SPARS10, NSAMP=15 Science exposure (grism) 40.0 SPARS200, NSAMP=13 Total time used 54.3

The buffer dumps incur no overhead because the first undispersed exposure can be dumped during the long grism exposures, and the last two can be dumped during the subsequent target occultation. Thus, since at least 54 minutes of target visibility are available at any target’s declination, this set of observations can be obtained in one orbit.