7.8 IR Sensitivity
7.8.1 Limiting Magnitudes
Table 7.10 presents the predicted limiting-magnitude performance of the WFC3/IR channel and compares it with that of camera 3 on NICMOS (NIC3) and the Near Infrared Camera on JWST (NIRCam). The calculations are based on an optimal extraction of a point source. The limiting ABMAG at an SNR of 10 was calculated for a 1-hour and a 10-hour exposure. The throughput curves for the WFC3 filters listed in the second column were used; for NIC3 and NIRCam, the most similar wide-band filters were used.
An online Exposure Time Calculator (ETC) is available (see Section 9.2).
Table 7.10: Limiting-magnitude performance of WFC3 compared with that of the NICMOS NIC3 and JWST's NIRCam.
Band | Filter | Limiting magnitude | Limiting magnitude in 10 hours | ||||||||
| WFC3 | NIC3 | NIRCam | WFC3 | NIC3 | NIRCam | WFC3 | NIC3 | NIRCam | |||
| J | F110W | F110W | F115W | 27.3 | 26.1 | 28.2 | 28.6 | 27.4 | 29.5 | ||
| H | F160W | F160W | F150W | 26.6 | 25.9 | 28.4 | 27.9 | 27.1 | 29.7 | ||
7.8.2 Sensitivity
The WFC3/IR detector exhibits a low level sensitivity loss at rates of ~0.1% per year, with greater losses at shorter wavelengths (WFC3 ISR 2024-06). The total sensitivity loss since WFC3 installation in 2009 is ~ 1-2%, comparable to the IR detector repeatability (WFC3 ISR 2024-01; WFC3 ISR 2021-05; WFC3 ISR 2020-10; WFC3 ISR 2019-07).
To account for the time-dependent sensitivity of the IR detector, inverse sensitivities for all 15 WFC3/IR filters were updated in December 2024 (WFC3 ISR 2024-13). These new time-dependent inverse sensitivities were derived by using ~ 14 years of observations of five CALSPEC standards, corrected for the recommended loss rates from WFC3 ISR 2024-06 (see Table 7.11). In tandem, the calibration pipeline was updated; as of calwf3 v3.7.2, the pipeline now implements the time-dependent flux calibration and populates the image file header with time-dependent photometric keywords. The new inverse sensitivities provide an internal photometric precision better than 0.5% for all wide--, medium--, and narrow-band filters.
The new inverse sensitivities can now be computed for specific observation dates by using the Python package stsynphot (WFC3 ISR 2024-13).
Table 7.11: Sensitivity loss rates and pivot wavelengths for F098M and all five wide-band filters, used to implement time-dependent sensitivity corrections in the calibration pipeline (remaining medium-band and all narrow-band filters use the nearest wavelength solution).
| Filter | Pivot λ (nm) | Sensitivity Loss Rate (% / year) |
|---|---|---|
| F098M | 986.4 | - 0.120 +/- 0.003 |
| F105W | 1055.5 | |
| F110W | 1153.4 | |
| F125W | 1248.6 | - 0.075 +/- 0.006 |
| F140W | 1392.3 | - 0.060 +/- 0.005 |
| F160W | 1536.9 |
Monitoring of the IR channel sensitivity is carried out via several ongoing calibration programs. Staring mode observations of stellar clusters over a ~14-year baseline suggests small sensitivity loss rates of ~0.1% per year (WFC3 ISR 2024-06; WFC3 ISR 2022-07). Studies of WFC3/IR grism observations of CALSPEC standards also show small declines in sensitivity, about 0.1-0.3% per year, depending on the length of the observation baseline and the extraction wavelength range (WFC3 ISR 2024-06; WFC3 ISR 2024-01; Bohlin and Deustua, 2019). WFC3/IR scan observations of stars in the open cluster M35 over ~ 7 years suggest losses of about 0.16% per year in F098M and 0.06% per year in F140W. Recent analysis of 13 cycles of WFC3/IR internal flat field calibration programs indicated greater count rate losses at bluer wavelengths, with an average of ~0.3% per year averaged across all filters, suggesting a combination of effects from both the changing overall sensitivity as well as previously observed lamp reddening (WFC3 ISR 2024-10).
In contrast to the UVIS detector, staring mode monitoring of CALSPEC standards in the IR filters have large systematic uncertainties which limit their 1-sigma photometric repeatability to +/- 1.0% (WFC3 ISR 2024-06), and therefore cannot be used for accurately measuring the sensitivity loss rates, despite their significant time baseline (~14 years). However, these data can be (and were) used to test the appropriateness of calculated sensitivity loss rates, such as those previously listed; this approach was leveraged in WFC3 ISR 2024-06 in order to optimize sensitivity loss rates for each WFC3/IR filter.
For a more detailed discussion of WFC3/IR sources of errors, see Section 7.11 and Section 9.1 of the WFC3 Data Handbook.
-
WFC3 Instrument Handbook
- • Acknowledgments
- Chapter 1: Introduction to WFC3
- Chapter 2: WFC3 Instrument Description
- Chapter 3: Choosing the Optimum HST Instrument
- Chapter 4: Designing a Phase I WFC3 Proposal
- Chapter 5: WFC3 Detector Characteristics and Performance
-
Chapter 6: UVIS Imaging with WFC3
- • 6.1 WFC3 UVIS Imaging
- • 6.2 Specifying a UVIS Observation
- • 6.3 UVIS Channel Characteristics
- • 6.4 UVIS Field Geometry
- • 6.5 UVIS Spectral Elements
- • 6.6 UVIS Optical Performance
- • 6.7 UVIS Exposure and Readout
- • 6.8 UVIS Sensitivity
- • 6.9 Charge Transfer Efficiency
- • 6.10 Other Considerations for UVIS Imaging
- • 6.11 UVIS Observing Strategies
- Chapter 7: IR Imaging with WFC3
- Chapter 8: Slitless Spectroscopy with WFC3
-
Chapter 9: WFC3 Exposure-Time Calculation
- • 9.1 Overview
- • 9.2 The WFC3 Exposure Time Calculator - ETC
- • 9.3 Calculating Sensitivities from Tabulated Data
- • 9.4 Count Rates: Imaging
- • 9.5 Count Rates: Slitless Spectroscopy
- • 9.6 Estimating Exposure Times
- • 9.7 Sky Background
- • 9.8 Interstellar Extinction
- • 9.9 Exposure-Time Calculation Examples
- Chapter 10: Overheads and Orbit Time Determinations
-
Appendix A: WFC3 Filter Throughputs
- • A.1 Introduction
-
A.2 Throughputs and Signal-to-Noise Ratio Data
- • UVIS F200LP
- • UVIS F218W
- • UVIS F225W
- • UVIS F275W
- • UVIS F280N
- • UVIS F300X
- • UVIS F336W
- • UVIS F343N
- • UVIS F350LP
- • UVIS F373N
- • UVIS F390M
- • UVIS F390W
- • UVIS F395N
- • UVIS F410M
- • UVIS F438W
- • UVIS F467M
- • UVIS F469N
- • UVIS F475W
- • UVIS F475X
- • UVIS F487N
- • UVIS F502N
- • UVIS F547M
- • UVIS F555W
- • UVIS F600LP
- • UVIS F606W
- • UVIS F621M
- • UVIS F625W
- • UVIS F631N
- • UVIS F645N
- • UVIS F656N
- • UVIS F657N
- • UVIS F658N
- • UVIS F665N
- • UVIS F673N
- • UVIS F680N
- • UVIS F689M
- • UVIS F763M
- • UVIS F775W
- • UVIS F814W
- • UVIS F845M
- • UVIS F850LP
- • UVIS F953N
- • UVIS FQ232N
- • UVIS FQ243N
- • UVIS FQ378N
- • UVIS FQ387N
- • UVIS FQ422M
- • UVIS FQ436N
- • UVIS FQ437N
- • UVIS FQ492N
- • UVIS FQ508N
- • UVIS FQ575N
- • UVIS FQ619N
- • UVIS FQ634N
- • UVIS FQ672N
- • UVIS FQ674N
- • UVIS FQ727N
- • UVIS FQ750N
- • UVIS FQ889N
- • UVIS FQ906N
- • UVIS FQ924N
- • UVIS FQ937N
- • IR F098M
- • IR F105W
- • IR F110W
- • IR F125W
- • IR F126N
- • IR F127M
- • IR F128N
- • IR F130N
- • IR F132N
- • IR F139M
- • IR F140W
- • IR F153M
- • IR F160W
- • IR F164N
- • IR F167N
- Appendix B: Geometric Distortion
- Appendix C: Dithering and Mosaicking
- Appendix D: Bright-Object Constraints and Image Persistence
-
Appendix E: Reduction and Calibration of WFC3 Data
- • E.1 Overview
- • E.2 The STScI Reduction and Calibration Pipeline
- • E.3 The SMOV Calibration Plan
- • E.4 The Cycle 17 Calibration Plan
- • E.5 The Cycle 18 Calibration Plan
- • E.6 The Cycle 19 Calibration Plan
- • E.7 The Cycle 20 Calibration Plan
- • E.8 The Cycle 21 Calibration Plan
- • E.9 The Cycle 22 Calibration Plan
- • E.10 The Cycle 23 Calibration Plan
- • E.11 The Cycle 24 Calibration Plan
- • E.12 The Cycle 25 Calibration Plan
- • E.13 The Cycle 26 Calibration Plan
- • E.14 The Cycle 27 Calibration Plan
- • E.15 The Cycle 28 Calibration Plan
- • E.16 The Cycle 29 Calibration Plan
- • E.17 The Cycle 30 Calibration Plan
- • E.18 The Cycle 31 Calibration Plan
- • E.19 The Cycle 32 Calibration Plan
- • E.20 The Cycle 33 Calibration Plan
- • Glossary